OpenLab Science vs. PhET | OpenLab Science

An honest, sourced comparison of OpenLab Science and PhET Interactive Simulations for physics classrooms, with a "use both" section.

PhET is the category default for free physics simulations — a well-earned reputation built on 167 simulations, a strong accessibility program, and more language translations than any other product compared on this site. This page is not an argument that PhET is worse. It is a specific answer to a specific question: what does OpenLab add for a teacher who already knows and likely already uses PhET?

Curriculum & standards coverage

Named framework coverage

Mapping depth

Simulation & lab capability

Library size

Interactivity depth

Live formula + SI-unit transparency

Data tables, graphing & analysis

Browser-based, no install

Investigation & assignment workflow

Printable worksheets + answer keys

Investigation notebook / evidence capture

Teacher assignment, progress & grading tools

Save / share a configured scene

Data export (CSV or similar)

AI guidance

AI tutor / assistant

Accessibility & reach

Accessibility

Languages supported

Pricing

Free tier

Paid tier / entry price

When to use which — honestly

PhET remains the stronger choice for the widest possible simulation library, for the deepest accessibility program available today, and for a classroom that needs a simulation in a language OpenLab does not yet support. OpenLab is the stronger choice when a teacher wants a printable worksheet with a real answer key tied to the exact simulation the class ran, when standards alignment needs to be a specific unit-to-lab map rather than a general correlation, or when a live substituted formula next to the running scene is the point of the lesson. Many teachers reasonably use both.

The honest summary: PhET is bigger and has been accessible-by-design for longer. OpenLab is narrower, but every lab ships with a worksheet, an answer key, a live formula panel, and a real per-unit standards map behind it.