Nuclear Binding Energy: The Liquid-Drop Model
1 · Predict
The semi-empirical mass formula (liquid-drop model) estimates a nucleus's total binding energy from its proton count Z and mass number A. Holding Z fixed at 26 (iron) and changing only A, does the model predict binding energy increasing steadily with every added nucleon?
- Yes — more nucleons always means more total binding energy.
- No — the binding energy depends on a balance of competing terms (volume, surface, Coulomb, asymmetry) that shift differently as A grows, so it doesn't simply increase with every added nucleon.
- Binding energy always decreases as A increases.
2 · Set Up
- Open the iron-binding preset and press Reset. This preset models iron with Z = 26 protons.
- Enable the binding-energy readout.
- Set the mass number A for each trial (holding Z = 26 fixed) and record the total binding energy.
3 · Collect Data
| Mass number A | Total binding energy E_B (MeV) |
|---|---|
| 56 | |
| 80 | |
| 110 |
Plot binding energy E_B (y-axis) against mass number A (x-axis) for your three trials.
4 · Analyze
- For one trial, compute E_B = a_vA − a_sA^(2/3) − a_cZ(Z−1)/A^(1/3) − a_a(A−2Z)²/A using a_v = 15.75, a_s = 17.8, a_c = 0.711, a_a = 23.7 (MeV), Z = 26. Compare to the table.
- Your three trials rise and then fall — E_B climbs from A = 56 to A = 80, then drops again by A = 110. Explain how the volume term +a_vA, which grows with every nucleon added, is eventually overtaken by the surface and asymmetry terms, and why −a_a(A−2Z)²/A penalises a nucleus whose neutron count runs far ahead of its proton count.
5 · Extend
- This same liquid-drop model explains why very heavy nuclei (large A) release energy through fission (splitting) while very light nuclei release energy through fusion (combining) — both processes move nuclei toward the peak binding-energy-per-nucleon region near iron. Explain why iron sits near this peak.
- This is a simplified version of the semi-empirical mass formula (it omits the pairing term for even/odd nucleon counts), so its predictions won't exactly match a real nuclear mass table. Why might physicists still find a simplified model like this useful for teaching, even knowing it's not perfectly accurate?
The Physics Behind This Experiment
Mass–Energy Equivalence (Binding Energy)
A nucleus's mass is less than the sum of its separate protons and neutrons — that missing mass Δm converts to binding energy via B = Δmc², the energy holding the nucleus together. The value of Δm itself (and so B) comes from the semi-empirical mass formula's competing volume, surface, Coulomb, and asymmetry terms, modeling the nucleus as a liquid drop.
Modern Physics
- The Photoelectric Effect: A Sharp Energy Threshold
- The Photoelectric Effect: Stopping Potential
- A Real Photocell: Sodium's Work Function
- Compton Scattering: Wavelength Shift at 90°
- Compton Scattering: Maximum Shift at Backscatter
- Compton Scattering: A Shallow-Angle Comparison
- The Balmer Series: Visible Hydrogen Spectral Lines
- The Lyman Series: Ultraviolet Hydrogen Lines
- The Paschen Series: Infrared Hydrogen Lines
- Radioactive Decay: Carbon-14 Dating
- Medical Radioisotopes: Technetium-99m's Short Half-Life
- De Broglie Matter Waves: An Electron's Wavelength