The Uncertainty Tradeoff at Everyday Atomic Scale

1 · Predict

At the scale of a single atom (roughly a nanometre), how does the minimum momentum uncertainty compare across a range of confinement sizes?

2 · Set Up

  1. Open the position-momentum-tradeoff preset and press Reset. This preset explores confinement near atomic (nanometre) scale.
  2. Enable the minimum-momentum-uncertainty readout.
  3. Set the confinement region Δx for each trial and record the minimum possible momentum uncertainty.

3 · Collect Data

Confinement region Δx (nm)Momentum uncertainty Δp (×10⁻²⁵ kg·m/s) (×10⁻²⁵ kg·m/s)
0.5
1
2

Plot Δp (y-axis) against 1/Δx (x-axis) for your three trials. Is the line straight through the origin?

4 · Analyze

  1. For one trial, compute Δp_min = ℏ/(2Δx) using ℏ = 1.055×10⁻³⁴ J·s. Compare to the table.
  2. Confirm your data shows a clean inverse proportionality: doubling Δx exactly halves Δp_min. Explain why this specific inverse relationship (rather than, say, inverse-square) follows directly from the uncertainty principle's Δx·Δp ≥ ℏ/2 form.

5 · Extend

  1. Early (pre-quantum) models imagined electrons orbiting a nucleus on precise, well-defined paths — like tiny planets. Explain why the uncertainty principle at atomic scale makes such a definite-position, definite-momentum orbit fundamentally impossible, motivating the 'electron cloud' picture instead.
  2. Compare your Δp values here (atomic scale, nanometre confinement) to the gamma-confinement experiment's (nuclear scale, femtometre confinement, five orders of magnitude smaller Δx). Explain why confining a particle 100,000× more tightly produces a 100,000× larger minimum momentum uncertainty.

The Physics Behind This Experiment

Uncertainty Principle Scaling

Because Δp_min = ℏ/(2Δx), the minimum momentum uncertainty scales as exactly 1/Δx — tightening the position confinement by any factor loosens the momentum certainty by that same factor.

← Back to experiment